Bodybuilding and its place in Singapore sports
Tuesday, July 22nd, 2008That is, until bodybuilding was admitted into the sporting fold in 1976, and proved to be a goldmine on which at least two golds could always be depended ….
EVER since the inauguration of the South-east Asian Peninsular Games in 1959 and, later, the South-east Asia Games, Singapore could count only on swimming - and a bit on yachting, bowling and athletics - to contribute to our gold-medal tally.
That is, until bodybuilding was admitted into the sporting fold in 1976, and proved to be a goldmine on which at least two golds could always be depended upon at every meet.
In 1983, when Singapore again hosted the biennial event, bodybuilding scored a 100 per cent success by grabbing all six gold medals at stake - a record unprecedented in our history books.
But, despite its strong potential in regional, Asian and Commonwealth meets, the sport was almost devoid of commercial support - unlike football, athletics, bowling, squash and badminton.
This was partly due to the lack of popularity, spectator participation and media hype, coupled with the belief that the sport has an association with drugs and doping.
The Singapore Bodybuilding and Fitness Federation’s biggest boo-boo was the Jojo Sinclair affair of 1995, when Sinclair, the first Asian woman to win a world title, was nominated - inadvertently - for the Sportswoman of the Year award, and then later found guilty of doping and banned for life.
This was followed by corruption charges instituted against SBBF president Paul Chua by Singapore’s 1993 world middleweight champion, Azman Abdullah - Sinclair’s Mixed Pairs partner.
Chua was hauled up by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau for investigation and the allegations were found to be false.
Despite this, Chua showed his magnanimity 10 years later by welcoming Azman back into the bodybuilding fold.
One would think that all the ripples that the sport - and Chua - had created would surely be enough to diffuse one dark lining.
But, no. The Singapore Sports Council and the Singapore National Olympic Council thought differently.
The SNOC banned the SBBF for one year, and the SSC froze funding for the SBBF for six years.
Chua admits today that he then had to fork out money from his own pocket for six years to fund athletes’ participation in regional meets.
These were the years of ‘hellish nightmare’ for the now-65-year-old.
‘My life was simply torn apart by the scandal and controversy in the newspapers, on TV, everywhere,’ he said.
From that point onwards, drug testing became mandatory for every major competition - even the nationals.
and the SBBF even organised their own workshops, with qualified speakers and experts on the subject of doping, drug testing and steroids.
‘The SBBF seems to be the only sports body with access to world-class personnel on such matters,’ Chua said.
‘and we have conducted such programmes for our athletes and officials by tapping on these experts.
‘We even wanted to do it for the SSC but they don’t seem to be too keen.’
In fact, at a press conference conducted under SSC auspices three years ago, following a spate of positive drug-test results of juniors, it was revealed that the ‘downturn’ could be attributed to the extreme vigilance of the SBBF, and nothing else.